Genetic modifications could create a gap between athletes who can afford enhancements and those who cannot. Unlike advanced training and equipment, which are available to many, genetic editing would likely be restricted to a privileged few, making competition unequal. Sports organisations, including the World Anti-Doping Agency, have banned genetic doping to preserve fair play.
Health risks are another major concern. Gene editing is still a developing science, and long-term effects remain uncertain. Altering genes to enhance muscle growth or stamina could lead to unforeseen medical complications, such as heart problems or immune system disorders. Young athletes, including children, might feel pressured to undergo genetic modifications to stay competitive, despite the risks.
Some argue that genetic enhancements are just another step in the evolution of sports, much like nutrition plans or high-tech training. However, unlike traditional methods to enhance performance, genetic changes could permanently alter the human body and future generations. Sports are supposed to be about hard work, talent, and dedication. If some athletes are genetically modified to be stronger or faster, it creates an unfair advantage. It wouldn’t just be about training anymore – it would be about who has access to the best genetic technology. That could leave athletes who rely only on practice and effort at a huge disadvantage.
At that point, would we still be testing human ability? Or just science?
Rose (VI)